Swans Commentary » swans.com June 18, 2007  



The Insurgent Word: Fragments


by Gerard Donnelly Smith





(Swans - June 18, 2007)   I've been thinking about fragmentation too much of late, about words fragmenting into multiple, disparate meanings, about movements fragmenting along demarcations defined by false dichotomies, about communities fragmented by political pressures designed for anti-democratic ends.

To fragment, break apart into separate pieces (i.e., fragmentation bomb). The pieces of the body are now isolated from one another. The body politic separates into factions, following ideologies that use fractions of the law.

Meaning becomes a fragment in a catch phrase, in a sound bit, separated from its context. The symbol becomes an icon, a rallying cry, separated from its history. The news becomes a platform, an agenda, separated from the truth.

To fragment a unified front, turn one subgroup upon another. Infiltration: an enemy within spreads the fear that sets one comrade against the other. Define a difference, then makes that difference dangerous.

Cut deals, offer bribes, and buy votes, so that democracy becomes a function of power. Ten thousand voices clamor before the temple gates, begging indulgence for their people, for their stake holders, for their corporations. The voice for all disappears beneath the deafening cacophony. The fragmentation threatens to overwhelm us.

When sects and parties form, the use of heretic, pagan, gentile, liberal, neo-con to denounce former brethren increases. Minorities played one against the other keep people, or parties, or organizations, or religious groups from gaining too much power. Diversity becomes crowd control.

I am left thinking about false dilemmas: either one language or Babel, one religion or damnation, one political will or strife, one corporation or else. The common cause cannot survive if the people do not own the commons. The body politic cannot survive if common cause does regulate the body. Common cause is not to be defined by national boundaries, corporate boards, political or religious leaders.

The fragment nor the whole may exist without the other.

All decisions must abide by this unifying truth: benefits all, hurts none.


· · · · · ·


If you find our work valuable, please consider helping us financially.

· · · · · ·


Internal Resources

Patterns which Connect

Myths & Realities



About the Author

Gerard Donnelly Smith on Swans (with bio).



Please, feel free to insert a link to this work on your Web site or to disseminate its URL on your favorite lists, quoting the first paragraph or providing a summary. However, please DO NOT steal, scavenge, or repost this work on the Web or any electronic media. Inlining, mirroring, and framing are expressly prohibited. Pulp re-publishing is welcome -- please contact the publisher. This material is copyrighted, © Gerard Donnelly Smith 2007. All rights reserved.


Have your say

Do you wish to share your opinion? We invite your comments. E-mail the Editor. Please include your full name, address and phone number (the city, state/country where you reside is paramount information). When/if we publish your opinion we will only include your name, city, state, and country.


· · · · · ·


This Edition's Internal Links

A Rudderless, Co-opted Antiwar "Movement" - Gilles d'Aymery

The Founding Fathers' Fraud - Philip Greenspan

Tangled Web Of Life Or Worse - Carol Warner Christen

Walking The Dog - Humor by Peter Byrne

Artifacts - Poem by Martin Murie

Sundays In Hope - Poem by Marie Rennard

Polyhedron n.3: Moenia Mundi - Poem by Guido Monte & Francesca Saieva

Adam Sisman's The Friendship: Wordsworth & Coleridge - Book Review by Charles Marowitz

New Art And Imperialism In Dublin - Peter Byrne

Blips #52 - From the Martian Desk - Gilles d'Aymery

Letters to the Editor

· · · · · ·


[About]-[Past Issues]-[Archives]-[Resources]-[Copyright]



Swans -- ISSN: 1554-4915
URL for this work: http://www.swans.com/library/art13/gsmith88.html
Published June 18, 2007